Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Grok 4.1
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4.1 leads 43.2 to 29.2.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 41.5 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-11-17 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1214 |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1445 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 39% |
Reasoning Grok 4.1 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1435 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1422 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.1 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1417 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1425 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1465 |
| LMArena French | — | 1448 |
| LMArena German | — | 1446 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1397 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1407 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1438 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1400 |
Long Context Grok 4.1 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1416 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1437 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Grok 4.1?
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Grok 4.1 better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 33.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Grok 4.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 has 19.