Model comparison

Grok 4.1 Fast vs Molmo 2 8b

Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.1 Fast xAI

40.9

Rank #131 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.1 Fast scores higher in 5 categories and Molmo 2 8b in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.1 Fast leads 42.3 to 24.5.
  • Molmo 2 8b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.1 Fast and Molmo 2 8b specifications
Grok 4.1 FastMolmo 2 8b
ProviderxAIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index40.938.7
Released2025-06-27—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window128K—
Max output30K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.20—
Output $ / M tokens$0.50—
Results tracked325

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Grok 4.1 Fast: 33.8 (#236), Molmo 2 8b: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastMolmo 2 8b
LMArena WebDev1241—
LMArena Coding1411—
ALE-Bench394.93—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.1 (#35), Molmo 2 8b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastMolmo 2 8b
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard69.6%—
τ²-bench Banking13.1%—
LMArena Search1171—
Vending-Bench 21,107—

Reasoning Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.3 (#45), Molmo 2 8b: 24.5 (#146)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastMolmo 2 8b
LMArena Hard Prompts14071288
SimpleBench56%—
NYT Connections (extended)87.4%—
DTBench87.7%—
ForecastBench61—

Math Not comparable

Grok 4.1 Fast: 30.9 (#201), Molmo 2 8b: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastMolmo 2 8b
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions60.9%—
ProofBench4%—
LMArena Math1408—

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok 4.1 Fast: 32.6 (#203), Molmo 2 8b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastMolmo 2 8b
Vectara Hallucination Rate17.8%—
LMArena Expert1398—

Multimodal Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.3 (#71), Molmo 2 8b: 29.5 (#106)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastMolmo 2 8b
LMArena Vision12011081

Multilingual Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Grok 4.1 Fast: 51.1 (#110), Molmo 2 8b: 42.8 (#186)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastMolmo 2 8b
LMArena Non-English13911275
LMArena Chinese1441—
LMArena French1416—
LMArena German1404—
LMArena Japanese1347—
LMArena Korean1361—
LMArena Russian1387—
LMArena Spanish1411—

Instruction Following Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Grok 4.1 Fast: 72.8 (#127), Molmo 2 8b: 67.2 (#196)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastMolmo 2 8b
LMArena Instruction Following13761270

Long Context Not comparable

Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.4 (#121), Molmo 2 8b: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastMolmo 2 8b
LMArena Longer Query1390—

Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Grok 4.1 Fast: 57.4 (#126), Molmo 2 8b: 49.5 (#187)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastMolmo 2 8b
LMArena Text14081288
LMArena Creative Writing1394—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1327—
LMArena Multi-Turn1389—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.1 Fast better than Molmo 2 8b?

Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 Fast and Molmo 2 8b share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 Fast has 32 scored results on Noometry and Molmo 2 8b has 5.

Related comparisons

Go deeper