Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Grok-2 (Dec 2024)
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 39.7 to 20.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 63.5% for Grok-2 (Dec 2024).
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 33.7 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2024-08-13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 34 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 33.3 (#258)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | 46.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 22.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1287 |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.9 (#299)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | 54.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | 54.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 130.48 |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | 54.3% |
| SimpleBench | — | 22.7% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1272 |
| DTBench | — | 65.2% |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 20.8 (#284)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | 54.9% |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 63.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 11.5% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1283 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 0.7% |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#233)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 53.8% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | 20.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1254 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.1 (#188)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1289 |
| LMArena French | — | 1318 |
| LMArena German | — | 1287 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1244 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1237 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1286 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1281 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 66.9 (#202)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | 69.6% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1270 |
Long Context Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.8 (#190)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1276 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.6 (#198)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | 45.6% |
| LMArena Text | — | 1305 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1284 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 63.6% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1290 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Grok-2 (Dec 2024)?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34.