Model comparison

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) vs Molmo 2 8b

Molmo 2 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) xAI

33.7

Rank #239 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) scores higher in 1 category and Molmo 2 8b in 3 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Molmo 2 8b leads 25.6 to 16.9.
  • Molmo 2 8b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Molmo 2 8b specifications
Grok-2 (Dec 2024)Molmo 2 8b
ProviderxAIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index33.739.1
Released2024-08-13—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked345

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 33.3 (#258), Molmo 2 8b: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Molmo 2 8b
WeirdML22.2%—
LiveBench Coding46.4%—
LMArena Coding1287—

Reasoning Molmo 2 8b leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.9 (#299), Molmo 2 8b: 25.6 (#146)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Molmo 2 8b
LMArena Hard Prompts12721287
SimpleBench22.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning54.8%—
DTBench65.2%—
LiveBench Data Analysis54.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index130.48—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 20.8 (#284), Molmo 2 8b: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Molmo 2 8b
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202511.5%—
LiveBench Math54.9%—
LMArena Math1283—
MATH Level 563.5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#233), Molmo 2 8b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Molmo 2 8b
GPQA Diamond53.8%—
Confabulations20.1%—
LMArena Expert1254—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): —, Molmo 2 8b: 30.2 (#112)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Molmo 2 8b
LMArena Vision—1081

Multilingual Too close to call

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.1 (#188), Molmo 2 8b: 42.7 (#190)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Molmo 2 8b
LMArena Non-English12821276
LMArena Chinese1289—
LMArena French1318—
LMArena German1287—
LMArena Japanese1244—
LMArena Korean1237—
LMArena Russian1286—
LMArena Spanish1281—

Instruction Following Too close to call

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 66.9 (#202), Molmo 2 8b: 67.0 (#201)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Molmo 2 8b
LMArena Instruction Following12701270
LiveBench Instruction Following69.6%—

Long Context Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.8 (#190), Molmo 2 8b: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Molmo 2 8b
LMArena Longer Query1276—

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.6 (#198), Molmo 2 8b: 49.4 (#191)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Molmo 2 8b
LMArena Text13051288
LMArena Creative Writing1284—
Short-Story Creative Writing63.6%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1290—
LiveBench Language45.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better than Molmo 2 8b?

Molmo 2 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Molmo 2 8b share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34 scored results on Noometry and Molmo 2 8b has 5.

Related comparisons

Go deeper