Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Granite 4.0 Micro
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 5 categories and Granite 4.0 Micro in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 39.7 to 12.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 28.3% for Granite 4.0 Micro.
- Granite 4.0 Micro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Granite 4.0 Micro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 29.0 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-10-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 118K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.017 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.11 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 8 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Granite 4.0 Micro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Granite 4.0 Micro: 19.2 (#265)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Granite 4.0 Micro: 12.0 (#307)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.8% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 20.9% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#304)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 28.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 39.5% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 30.7% |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Granite 4.0 Micro: 69.9 (#169)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| IFEval | — | 84.9% |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Granite 4.0 Micro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#216)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | — | 67% |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Granite 4.0 Micro?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Granite 4.0 Micro share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 Micro has 8.