Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs GPT-6 Luna
GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.1 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-6 Luna leads 54.7 to 37.4.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-6 Luna | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 45.1 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2026-09-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.50 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-6 Luna leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182), GPT-6 Luna: 54.7 (#24)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 66.6% |
| FrontierCode | — | 42.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1583 |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1448 |
Reasoning GPT-6 Luna leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194), GPT-6 Luna: 31.7 (#68)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 68.7% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1415 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101), GPT-6 Luna: 35.6 (#140)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1396 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge GPT-6 Luna leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156), GPT-6 Luna: 40.1 (#110)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1458 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GPT-6 Luna: 42.0 (#27)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | — | 44.2% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GPT-6 Luna: 51.0 (#111)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1390 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1425 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1416 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57), GPT-6 Luna: 74.7 (#85)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1414 |
Long Context GPT-6 Luna leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287), GPT-6 Luna: 43.3 (#95)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1417 |
Writing & Preference GPT-6 Luna leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164), GPT-6 Luna: 58.4 (#115)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1357 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1400 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than GPT-6 Luna?
GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.1 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or GPT-6 Luna better for coding?
GPT-6 Luna scores higher on coding benchmarks: 54.7 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and GPT-6 Luna share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6 Luna has 18.