Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs GPT-5.4 mini
GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and GPT-5.4 mini in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5.4 mini leads 51.5 to 36.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 86.9% for GPT-5.4 mini.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5.4 mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 45.0 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2026-03-17 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 400K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.75 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $4.50 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 46 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.4 mini leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), GPT-5.4 mini: 45.2 (#72)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | — | 27% |
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1397 |
| SciCode | — | 49.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 60.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1438 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,189 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GPT-5.4 mini: 29.9 (#81)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 36.3% |
Reasoning GPT-5.4 mini leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), GPT-5.4 mini: 30.4 (#85)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 148.84 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 18.9% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 37.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 61.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 63.7% |
| CritPt | — | 10% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 61.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1424 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 11% |
| DTBench | — | 80% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 40.8% |
| ForecastBench | — | 57 |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math GPT-5.4 mini leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), GPT-5.4 mini: 45.5 (#75)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 51.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 9.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 88.9% |
| ProofBench | — | 21% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1419 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 28.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge GPT-5.4 mini leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), GPT-5.4 mini: 51.5 (#67)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 86.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 29.4% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.5% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1435 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GPT-5.4 mini: 39.7 (#56)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1245 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GPT-5.4 mini: 51.9 (#96)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1446 |
| LMArena French | — | 1440 |
| LMArena German | — | 1409 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1374 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1368 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1405 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), GPT-5.4 mini: 74.1 (#102)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1405 |
Long Context GPT-5.4 mini leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), GPT-5.4 mini: 43.0 (#112)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1407 |
Writing & Preference GPT-5.4 mini leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), GPT-5.4 mini: 64.0 (#58)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1370 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1665 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1429 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than GPT-5.4 mini?
GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or GPT-5.4 mini better for coding?
GPT-5.4 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.2 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and GPT-5.4 mini share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.4 mini has 46.