Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in long context, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 45.4 to 29.2.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 45.2 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1479 |
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1503 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 899.8 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 34.4% |
| CritPt | — | 4% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1488 |
| DTBench | — | 84.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 22% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1481 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1503 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1449 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1507 |
| LMArena French | — | 1488 |
| LMArena German | — | 1458 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1437 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1450 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1471 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1477 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1483 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1440 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1493 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1208 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1477 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.