Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs GLM-4.5V
Gemini 2.0 Pro and GLM-4.5V score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.1 vs 39.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in long context, where GLM-4.5V leads 39.6 to 29.2.
- GLM-4.5V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5V | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 39.8 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-08-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 64K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.80 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.5V leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1347 |
Reasoning GLM-4.5V leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 59.8% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1334 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1354 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1353 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1154 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1303 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1298 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1336 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1311 |
Long Context GLM-4.5V leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1304 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1333 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1295 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1332 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than GLM-4.5V?
Gemini 2.0 Pro and GLM-4.5V score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.1 vs 39.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or GLM-4.5V better for coding?
GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and GLM-4.5V share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5V has 15.