Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Grok 3
Gemini 2.0 Pro and Grok 3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.6 vs 39.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Grok 3 in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 3 leads 38.7 to 29.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Aider Polyglot: 35.6% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 53.3% for Grok 3.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 39.6 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-04-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 40 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182), Grok 3: 41.5 (#113)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | 53.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 37.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1432 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Grok 3: 30.2 (#69)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 29.5% |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194), Grok 3: 13.8 (#322)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 138.34 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| SimpleBench | — | 36.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 61.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 5.5% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1433 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101), Grok 3: 36.2 (#122)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 88.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 55.6% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 46.4% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1390 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 3.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Grok 3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156), Grok 3: 46.0 (#76)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 75.8% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | 14.2% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 78.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.8% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 65% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1420 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Grok 3: 52.5 (#81)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1448 |
| LMArena French | — | 1460 |
| LMArena German | — | 1431 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1374 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1417 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57), Grok 3: 75.2 (#69)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| IFEval | — | 88.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1409 |
Long Context Grok 3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287), Grok 3: 38.7 (#187)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | 58.3% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1439 |
Writing & Preference Grok 3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164), Grok 3: 56.0 (#136)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1426 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1414 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 76.4% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1186 |
| WildBench | — | 84.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1424 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Grok 3?
Gemini 2.0 Pro and Grok 3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.6 vs 39.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Grok 3 better for coding?
Grok 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.5 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Grok 3 share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Grok 3 has 40.