Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Qwen3.6 Flash
Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.6 Flash leads 29.0 to 15.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 57.8% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 84.4% for Qwen3.6 Flash.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3.6 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2026-04-27 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.19 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.13 |
| Results tracked | 54 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 326.4 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), Qwen3.6 Flash: 29.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | 35.2% |
| DTBench | 63.2% | 77.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | 143.26 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| LMCA | — | 31% |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), Qwen3.6 Flash: 39.0 (#117)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | 84.4% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 22.5% |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1352 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | 83.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | — |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1353 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Qwen3.6 Flash?
Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Qwen3.6 Flash share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.