Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 25.9 to 15.2.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | 1314 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1299 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 1298 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1289 |
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1353 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1275 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
Long Context Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1292 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1299 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.