Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs GLM-4.7-Flash
GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 4 categories and GLM-4.7-Flash in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where GLM-4.7-Flash leads 40.6 to 28.4.
- GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | GLM-4.7-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2026-01-19 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.06 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Results tracked | 54 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.7-Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | 1383 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), GLM-4.7-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning GLM-4.7-Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1356 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | 58.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 1355 |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge GLM-4.7-Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | 60.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1357 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), GLM-4.7-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1330 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1403 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | 1332 |
| LMArena German | 1353 | 1337 |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | 1283 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1332 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1327 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
Long Context GLM-4.7-Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1345 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1351 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1297 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | 1125 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1342 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than GLM-4.7-Flash?
GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or GLM-4.7-Flash better for coding?
GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and GLM-4.7-Flash share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.7-Flash has 21.