Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 4 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 38.0 to 28.2.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 38.1 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.2 (#308), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1351 | 1318 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.0 (#85), Olmo 3 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#308), Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1302 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.1 (#127), Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1351 | 1315 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#207), Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1340 | 1272 |
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 35.9 (#74), Olmo 3 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.6 (#144), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1390 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1354 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1255 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1293 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.6 (#91), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1275 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
Long Context Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#198), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1296 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.8 (#184), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1289 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 28.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.