Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Qwen Turbo

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 26.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Google

37.3

Rank #189 Confirmed

Qwen Turbo Alibaba (Qwen)

26.8

Rank #329 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads 31.8 to 14.5.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen Turbo
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.326.8
Released2025-02-052024-11-01
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.05
Output $ / M tokens—$0.20
Results tracked323

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.4 (#181), Qwen Turbo: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen Turbo
LiveBench Coding47.1%—
LMArena Coding1322—

Reasoning Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 21.2 (#203), Qwen Turbo: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen Turbo
LiveBench Reasoning50.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1324—
DTBench52.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis65.5%—
ForecastBench57.1—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.8 (#192), Qwen Turbo: 14.5 (#291)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen Turbo
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—6.1%
Omni-MATH37.4%—
LiveBench Math58.1%—
LMArena Math1309—
MATH Level 5—56.2%

Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.6 (#185), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#267)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen Turbo
GPQA Diamond—41.8%
MMLU-Pro72%—
GPQA (HELM)50%—
LMArena Expert1305—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 30.6 (#103), Qwen Turbo: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen Turbo
LMArena Vision1100—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.2 (#156), Qwen Turbo: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen Turbo
LMArena Non-English1323—
LMArena Chinese1339—
LMArena French1346—
LMArena German1306—
LMArena Japanese1302—
LMArena Korean1325—
LMArena Russian1328—
LMArena Spanish1313—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.6 (#158), Qwen Turbo: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen Turbo
LiveBench Instruction Following78.3%—
IFEval82.4%—
LMArena Instruction Following1305—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#155), Qwen Turbo: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen Turbo
LMArena Longer Query1321—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.9 (#172), Qwen Turbo: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen Turbo
LMArena Text1330—
LMArena Creative Writing1319—
WildBench79%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1307—
LiveBench Language34.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Qwen Turbo?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 26.8 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Qwen Turbo share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper