Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Mixtral 8x7B

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 24 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Google

37.8

Rank #194 Confirmed

Mixtral 8x7B Mistral AI

27.1

Rank #334 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 8 categories and Mixtral 8x7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads 35.0 to 11.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MMLU-Pro: 72% for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and 33.5% for Mixtral 8x7B.
  • Mixtral 8x7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMixtral 8x7B
ProviderGoogleMistral AI
Noometry Index37.827.1
Released2025-02-052023-12-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—32K
Max output—32K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.70
Output $ / M tokens—$0.70
Results tracked3238

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), Mixtral 8x7B: 32.8 (#269)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Coding13221126
LiveBench Coding47.1%—
HumanEval+—39.6%
MBPP+—49.7%

Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), Mixtral 8x7B: 18.2 (#285)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Hard Prompts13241115
DTBench52.5%49.6%
ForecastBench57.156.3
LiveBench Reasoning50.1%—
LiveBench Data Analysis65.5%—
Adversarial NLI—55.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—118.47
HellaSwag—86.7%
LiveBench54.3%—
PIQA—83.6%
WinoGrande—77.2%

Math Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), Mixtral 8x7B: 18.8 (#289)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMixtral 8x7B
Omni-MATH37.4%10.5%
LMArena Math13091147
LiveBench Math58.1%—
MATH Level 5—10%
GSM8K—74.4%

Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), Mixtral 8x7B: 11.0 (#301)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMixtral 8x7B
MMLU-Pro72%33.5%
GPQA (HELM)50%29.6%
LMArena Expert13051088
GPQA Diamond—30.6%
ARC (AI2) Challenge—87.3%
MMLU—70.6%
OpenBookQA—85.8%
TriviaQA—82.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), Mixtral 8x7B: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Vision1100—

Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), Mixtral 8x7B: 29.6 (#266)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Non-English13231077
LMArena Chinese13391055
LMArena French13471166
LMArena German13061114
LMArena Japanese1301931
LMArena Korean1325968
LMArena Russian13281090
LMArena Spanish13131111

Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), Mixtral 8x7B: 51.0 (#297)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMixtral 8x7B
IFEval82.4%57.5%
LMArena Instruction Following13051109
LiveBench Instruction Following78.3%—

Long Context Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), Mixtral 8x7B: 33.4 (#260)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Longer Query13201103

Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), Mixtral 8x7B: 34.2 (#270)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Text13301132
LMArena Creative Writing13191109
WildBench79%67.3%
LMArena Multi-Turn13071115
LiveBench Language34.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Mixtral 8x7B?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Mixtral 8x7B better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 32.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Mixtral 8x7B share?

24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x7B has 38.

Related comparisons

Go deeper