Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Mixtral 8x22B
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 24 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 8 categories and Mixtral 8x22B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads 35.0 to 15.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MMLU-Pro: 72% for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and 46% for Mixtral 8x22B.
- Mixtral 8x22B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Mixtral 8x22B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 37.8 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2024-04-17 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 64K |
| Max output | — | 64K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 32 | 34 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), Mixtral 8x22B: 24.2 (#329)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1166 |
| WeirdML | — | 3.2% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 40.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 50.2% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 72% |
| MBPP+ | — | 64.3% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 23.1 (#127)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 7.5% |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), Mixtral 8x22B: 19.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1324 | 1150 |
| DTBench | 52.5% | 55.1% |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | 56.3 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 122.03 |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), Mixtral 8x22B: 22.9 (#275)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 37.4% | 16.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1309 | 1184 |
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 24.2% |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), Mixtral 8x22B: 15.1 (#293)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | 46% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50% | 33.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1305 | 1113 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 34.1% |
| MMLU | — | 77.8% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), Mixtral 8x22B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1100 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), Mixtral 8x22B: 32.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1323 | 1128 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1339 | 1116 |
| LMArena French | 1347 | 1166 |
| LMArena German | 1306 | 1141 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1301 | 1037 |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | 1057 |
| LMArena Russian | 1328 | 1158 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1313 | 1151 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), Mixtral 8x22B: 57.7 (#266)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 82.4% | 72.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | 1147 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 78.3% | — |
Long Context Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), Mixtral 8x22B: 34.7 (#247)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1320 | 1144 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), Mixtral 8x22B: 36.9 (#262)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1330 | 1162 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1141 |
| WildBench | 79% | 71.1% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1307 | 1130 |
| LiveBench Language | 34.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Mixtral 8x22B?
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Mixtral 8x22B better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 24.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Mixtral 8x22B share?
24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x22B has 34.