Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Google

37.8

Rank #194 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

50.3

Rank #48 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.2 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 51.3 to 22.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 52.5% for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and 94.7% for Muse Spark 1.2.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMuse Spark 1.2
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index37.850.3
Released2025-02-052026-08-05
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked3231

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Coding13221495
DeepSWE—54.9%
LMArena WebDev—1533
FrontierSWE—12%
SciCode—56.4%
WeirdML—60.3%
LiveBench Coding47.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMuse Spark 1.2
APEX-Agents—36.4%
GDP.pdf—16%

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Hard Prompts13241486
DTBench52.5%94.7%
SimpleBench—74.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—79.2%
CritPt—17.7%
LiveBench Reasoning50.1%—
LiveBench Data Analysis65.5%—
LMCA—48.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—154.87
ForecastBench57.1—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Math13091471
ProofBench—43%
Omni-MATH37.4%—
LiveBench Math58.1%—

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Expert13051480
SimpleQA Verified—60.3%
MMLU-Pro72%—
GPQA (HELM)50%—

Multimodal Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision11001305

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Non-English13231478
LMArena Chinese13391511
LMArena French13471513
LMArena Russian13281487
LMArena Spanish13131498
LMArena German1306—
LMArena Japanese1301—
LMArena Korean1325—

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Instruction Following13051461
LiveBench Instruction Following78.3%—
IFEval82.4%—

Long Context Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Longer Query13201475

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text13301482
LMArena Creative Writing13191449
LMArena Multi-Turn13071494
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1840
WildBench79%—
LiveBench Language34.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Muse Spark 1.2 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.2 has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper