Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 33.8 to 13.3.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 38.1 |
| Released | 2024-10-03 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 34.9 (#221), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | 1318 |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 19.2 (#242), Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1210 | 1302 |
| DTBench | 50% | — |
Math Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 13.3 (#296), Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1207 | 1315 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.6% | — |
Knowledge Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 16.0 (#285), Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1185 | 1272 |
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 27.6 (#110), Olmo 3 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1044 | — |
Multilingual Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 38.6 (#224), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1215 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1231 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1233 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1206 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1236 | 1255 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1150 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1140 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1212 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 63.1 (#231), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1199 | 1275 |
Long Context Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 36.9 (#220), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 43.0 (#227), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1226 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1218 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1185 | 1289 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 34.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has 21 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.