Model comparison

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B Google

29.9

Rank #301 Confirmed

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.6

Rank #184 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 35.8 to 14.2.

Side by side

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 specifications
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8BHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
ProviderGoogleTencent
Noometry Index29.938.6
Released2024-10-03—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2112

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 35.5 (#225), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Coding12181307

Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 20.0 (#244), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Hard Prompts12091286
DTBench50%—

Math Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 14.2 (#302), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Math12071281
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.6%—

Knowledge Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 16.0 (#289), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Expert11851276
GPQA Diamond33%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 28.2 (#115), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Vision1044—

Multilingual Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 38.5 (#229), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Non-English12151265
LMArena Chinese12311346
LMArena Russian12361266
LMArena French1234—
LMArena German1206—
LMArena Japanese1150—
LMArena Korean1140—
LMArena Spanish1212—

Instruction Following Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 62.8 (#236), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Instruction Following11991277

Long Context Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 37.0 (#225), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Longer Query12191341

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 42.8 (#232), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Text12261288
LMArena Creative Writing12181264
LMArena Multi-Turn11851284

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.2 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has 21 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper