Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs phi-3-medium 14B
phi-3-medium 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and phi-3-medium 14B in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where phi-3-medium 14B leads 27.3 to 9.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 34% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 27.6% for phi-3-medium 14B.
- phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding phi-3-medium 14B leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | 121.23 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | — |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math phi-3-medium 14B leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | 17.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | — |
Knowledge Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 27.6% |
| MMLU | 70% | 78% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | — |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than phi-3-medium 14B?
phi-3-medium 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?
phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.8 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and phi-3-medium 14B share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.