Model comparison
Llama 3.2 90B vs phi-3-medium 14B
phi-3-medium 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Meta
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 90B scores higher in 1 category and phi-3-medium 14B in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where phi-3-medium 14B leads 27.3 to 11.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 39.4% for Llama 3.2 90B and 17.6% for phi-3-medium 14B.
Side by side
| Llama 3.2 90B | phi-3-medium 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 27.5 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2024-09-24 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | 121.23 |
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math phi-3-medium 14B leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308), phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | 17.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
Knowledge Llama 3.2 90B leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | 27.6% |
| MMLU | 80.3% | 78% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.2 90B better than phi-3-medium 14B?
phi-3-medium 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and phi-3-medium 14B share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.