Model comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.0 Pro Google

27.3

Rank #332 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.7

Rank #305 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 5 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads 31.6 to 9.3.
  • Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 1.0 Pro and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct specifications
Gemini 1.0 ProPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderGoogleMicrosoft
Noometry Index27.329.7
Released2023-12-132024-04-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2419

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 1.0 Pro leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Coding11081039
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.6%
HumanEval+55.5%—
MBPP+61.4%—

Reasoning Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts11091028
DTBench45.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index117.04—

Math Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Math11321089
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%—
MATH Level 511.2%—

Knowledge Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Expert1059984
GPQA Diamond34%—
MMLU70%—

Multilingual Gemini 1.0 Pro leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English11381000
LMArena Chinese11241016
LMArena French11451039
LMArena German11251006
LMArena Japanese1023899
LMArena Russian11861004
LMArena Spanish11191059
LMArena Korean—856

Instruction Following Gemini 1.0 Pro leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following11141023

Long Context Gemini 1.0 Pro leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1132996

Writing & Preference Gemini 1.0 Pro leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text11491050
LMArena Creative Writing11311024
LMArena Multi-Turn1139989

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.2 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper