Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
OLMo 2 Furious 13B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.2 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads 21.3 to 8.7.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 29.2 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | — |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | — |
| LMArena French | 1144 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | — |
Instruction Following OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | — |
Writing & Preference OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
OLMo 2 Furious 13B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.2 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.6 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.