Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Palm 2
Palm 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.0 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 5 categories and Palm 2 in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Palm 2 leads 30.8 to 9.3.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Palm 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 30.0 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 994 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning Palm 2 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1005 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |
Math Palm 2 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1049 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Palm 2: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 916 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 887 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1010 |
Long Context Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1010 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1027 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 991 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 994 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Palm 2?
Palm 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.0 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Palm 2 better for coding?
Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.2 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Palm 2 share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.