Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Magistral Small
Magistral Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.2 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and Magistral Small in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Magistral Small leads 26.2 to 9.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 30% for Magistral Small.
- Magistral Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Magistral Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 30.2 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2025-06-10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 40K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.50 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Magistral Small leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 35.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 45.9% | 61.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | 133.19 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 6.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | — |
Math Magistral Small leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 30% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge Magistral Small leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 56.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | — |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Magistral Small?
Magistral Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.2 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Magistral Small better for coding?
Magistral Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Magistral Small share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Small has 10.