Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Gemma 7B
Gemma 7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.0 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 5 categories and Gemma 7B in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 7B leads 31.2 to 9.3.
- Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 30.0 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2024-02-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1048 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | 28.7% |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | 43.4% |
Reasoning Gemma 7B leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1042 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | 111.99 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 48.7% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55.1% |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.2% |
| PIQA | — | 81.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 79% |
Math Gemma 7B leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1066 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 46.4% |
Knowledge Gemma 7B leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1001 |
| MMLU | 70% | 66.1% |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 83.2% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 78.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 72.3% |
Multilingual Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 999 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1035 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | 1025 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 993 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1017 |
Long Context Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1022 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1056 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 963 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Gemma 7B?
Gemma 7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.0 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Gemma 7B better for coding?
Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.2 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Gemma 7B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 7B has 27.