Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.1 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads 24.9 to 15.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.2% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 56.1% for Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 30.1 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.7 (#169)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45% |
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.3% |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 19.2 (#266)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | 128.52 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | — |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
Math Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 16.2 (#296)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 7.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | 56.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | — |
Knowledge Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#266)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 46.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | — |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.1 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.