Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 36.1 to 9.3.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1314 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1299 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |
Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1298 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1289 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1275 |
Long Context Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.