Model comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.0 Pro Google

27.1

Rank #327 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

44.4

Rank #74 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 37.4 to 8.7.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 1.0 Pro and MiMo-V2.6-Flash specifications
Gemini 1.0 ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProviderGoogleXiaomi
Noometry Index27.144.4
Released2023-12-132026-09-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked2413

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Coding11081516
HumanEval+55.5%—
MBPP+61.4%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts11091481
DTBench45.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index116.97—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Math11321477
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%—
MATH Level 511.2%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Expert10591516
GPQA Diamond34%—
MMLU70%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision—1266

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Non-English11381439
LMArena Chinese11241501
LMArena Russian11861424
LMArena French1144—
LMArena German1125—
LMArena Japanese1023—
LMArena Spanish1118—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following11141463

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Longer Query11321465

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text11491459
LMArena Creative Writing11301408
LMArena Multi-Turn11391460

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper