Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 66.1 to 36.2.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 44.7 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 43.4 (#79)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1488 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 29.6 (#81)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1483 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | — |
Math Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 37.3 (#99)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1473 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.1 (#104)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1489 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.4 (#21)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1534 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | 1483 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1497 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1472 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | 1470 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1438 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.2 (#28)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1467 |
Long Context Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#44)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1477 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.1 (#39)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1471 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1478 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.