Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Yi-34B
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 42.2 to 7.5.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Yi-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 48.5 | 27.8 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | 2023-11-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1504 | 1112 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1637 | — |
| SciCode | 51.3% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1482 | 1104 |
| CritPt | 12% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 71.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 117.39 |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1468 | 1114 |
| ProofBench | 63% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 5.1% |
| GSM8K | — | 76% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1501 | 1061 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 14.7% |
| MMLU | — | 76.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47), Yi-34B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | 1079 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | 1176 |
| LMArena French | 1475 | 1081 |
| LMArena Russian | 1409 | 1050 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | 1070 |
| LMArena German | — | 1042 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 993 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 959 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | 1091 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1463 | 1094 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1455 | 1129 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | 1108 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1451 | 1113 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Yi-34B?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Yi-34B better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Yi-34B share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.