Model comparison
Llama 3.2 90B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Llama 3.2 90B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 51.9 to 11.1.
Side by side
| Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 27.5 | 48.5 |
| Released | 2024-09-24 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1637 |
| SciCode | — | 51.3% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1504 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 12% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1482 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | — |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 63% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1468 |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1501 |
| MMLU | 80.3% | — |
Multimodal MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | 1259 |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1511 |
| LMArena French | — | 1475 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1409 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1456 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1463 |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1463 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1400 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1451 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.2 90B better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.