Model comparison
Gemma 7B vs Llama 3.2 90B
Gemma 7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 2 categories and Llama 3.2 90B in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 7B leads 28.7 to 10.4.
Side by side
| Gemma 7B | Llama 3.2 90B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 29.9 (#290), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 7B: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |
Reasoning Llama 3.2 90B leads
Gemma 7B: 19.0 (#247), Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.74 | 125.5 |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |
Math Gemma 7B leads
Gemma 7B: 28.7 (#225), Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1066 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.4% |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |
Knowledge Gemma 7B leads
Gemma 7B: 26.8 (#248), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 66.1% | 80.3% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41% |
| LMArena Expert | 1002 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 7B: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 25.3 (#282), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | — |
| LMArena French | 1024 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 51.7 (#290), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#277), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 27.2 (#297), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 7B better than Llama 3.2 90B?
Gemma 7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Llama 3.2 90B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.