Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Max Preview in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads 63.8 to 29.1.
  • Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and Qwen3.6 Max Preview specifications
Falcon-180BQwen3.6 Max Preview
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index32.251.5
Released2023-09-062026-04-20
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.30
Output $ / M tokens—$7.80
Results tracked1629

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.7 (#54)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3.6 Max Preview
SWE-bench Verified—76.7%
LMArena WebDev—1482
LMArena Coding—1471

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3.6 Max Preview
Vending-Bench 2—4,254

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 41.7 (#53)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts10071457
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13149.24
SimpleBench—63%
NYT Connections (extended)—74.1%
Chess Puzzles—20%
Mystery Game Puzzles—19%
DTBench—87.2%
LMCA—42.5%
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.1 (#46)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3.6 Max Preview
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—91.1%
LMArena Math—1465
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—23.1%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#39)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3.6 Max Preview
GPQA Diamond—87.4%
SimpleQA Verified—52%
LMArena Expert—1478
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multilingual Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.2 (#48)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English10001437
LMArena Chinese—1487
LMArena French—1449
LMArena Russian—1445
LMArena Spanish—1454

Instruction Following Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.7 (#55)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following10471438

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#61)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query—1457

Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 63.8 (#60)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Text10541447
LMArena Creative Writing10891435
LMArena Multi-Turn10131456

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Qwen3.6 Max Preview share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper