Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs GLM-5.3-Flash

GLM-5.3-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.3-Flash Z.ai (Zhipu)

51.8

Rank #41 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5.3-Flash in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5.3-Flash leads 65.3 to 29.1.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and GLM-5.3-Flash specifications
Falcon-180BGLM-5.3-Flash
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index32.251.8
Released2023-09-062026-08-20
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.15
Output $ / M tokens—$0.50
Results tracked1640

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.1 (#31)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGLM-5.3-Flash
DeepSWE—63.4%
FrontierCode—31.8%
CursorBench—36.8%
LMArena WebDev—1609
FrontierSWE—18.1%
SciCode—51.6%
LMArena Coding—1508
ALE-Bench—303.55

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GLM-5.3-Flash: 34.2 (#47)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGLM-5.3-Flash
APEX-Agents—52.8%
GDP.pdf—14%

Reasoning GLM-5.3-Flash leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), GLM-5.3-Flash: 48.0 (#42)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGLM-5.3-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts10071491
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13151.88
ARC-AGI-2—65.8%
ARC-AGI-1—91%
CritPt—15.4%
Chess Puzzles—14%
Mystery Game Puzzles—8%
Surface Evolver Bench—52.5%
Bench to the Future 3—0.15
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.3 (#47)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGLM-5.3-Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—55.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4—17.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.9%
ProofBench—21%
LMArena Math—1500
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GLM-5.3-Flash: 58.4 (#36)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGLM-5.3-Flash
GPQA Diamond—90.2%
LMArena Expert—1513
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GLM-5.3-Flash: 42.8 (#27)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGLM-5.3-Flash
LMArena Vision—1296

Multilingual GLM-5.3-Flash leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), GLM-5.3-Flash: 56.0 (#25)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGLM-5.3-Flash
LMArena Non-English10001462
LMArena Chinese—1527
LMArena French—1496
LMArena German—1470
LMArena Japanese—1429
LMArena Korean—1446
LMArena Russian—1469
LMArena Spanish—1471

Instruction Following GLM-5.3-Flash leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), GLM-5.3-Flash: 77.5 (#20)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGLM-5.3-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following10471478

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GLM-5.3-Flash: 45.4 (#39)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGLM-5.3-Flash
LMArena Longer Query—1482

Writing & Preference GLM-5.3-Flash leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), GLM-5.3-Flash: 65.3 (#50)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGLM-5.3-Flash
LMArena Text10541471
LMArena Creative Writing10891442
LMArena Multi-Turn10131467

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than GLM-5.3-Flash?

GLM-5.3-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and GLM-5.3-Flash share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5.3-Flash has 40.

Related comparisons

Go deeper