Noometry

Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Falcon-180B Technology Innovation Institute

32.2

Rank #260 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #42 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 65.0 to 29.1.
  • Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Falcon-180BQwen3.7 Max
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index32.251.5
Released2023-09-062026-05-19
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked1633

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3.7 Max
SWE-bench Verified—77.3%
LMArena WebDev—1515
SciCode—48.8%
LMArena Coding—1498
ALE-Bench—1,189

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3.7 Max
GBAEval—0.4%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts10071483
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13153.68
SimpleBench—70.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
CritPt—13.4%
Chess Puzzles—19%
EBR-Bench—9.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles—32%
DTBench—92.3%
LMCA—44%
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3.7 Max
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—64.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—34.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
ProofBench—26%
LMArena Math—1490
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3.7 Max
GPQA Diamond—90.9%
SimpleQA Verified—55.8%
LMArena Expert—1488
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Max leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Non-English10001474
LMArena Chinese—1530
LMArena Russian—1484

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Max leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Instruction Following10471460

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Longer Query—1482

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Max leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text10541476
LMArena Creative Writing10891449
LMArena Multi-Turn10131481
EQ-Bench 4—1110

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Qwen3.7 Max share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper