Model comparison

Pixtral Large vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Pixtral Large Mistral AI

32.2

Rank #259 Reported

Qwen3.6 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #43 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads 63.8 to 32.9.
  • Both cost about the same: $2 input and $6 output per million tokens.
  • Qwen3.6 Max Preview accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.
  • Pixtral Large has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Pixtral Large and Qwen3.6 Max Preview specifications
Pixtral LargeQwen3.6 Max Preview
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index32.251.5
Released2024-11-012026-04-20
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K262K
Max output128K66K
Input $ / M tokens$2$1.30
Output $ / M tokens$6$7.80
Results tracked329

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Pixtral Large: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.7 (#54)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPixtral LargeQwen3.6 Max Preview
SWE-bench Verified—76.7%
LMArena WebDev—1482
LMArena Coding—1471

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Pixtral Large: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkPixtral LargeQwen3.6 Max Preview
Vending-Bench 2—4,254

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Pixtral Large: 21.7 (#218), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 41.7 (#53)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPixtral LargeQwen3.6 Max Preview
SimpleBench—63%
NYT Connections (extended)—74.1%
Chess Puzzles—20%
EnigmaEval0.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1457
Mystery Game Puzzles—19%
DTBench—87.2%
LMCA—42.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.24

Math Not comparable

Pixtral Large: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.1 (#46)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPixtral LargeQwen3.6 Max Preview
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—91.1%
LMArena Math—1465
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—23.1%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%

Knowledge Not comparable

Pixtral Large: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#39)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPixtral LargeQwen3.6 Max Preview
GPQA Diamond—87.4%
SimpleQA Verified—52%
LMArena Expert—1478

Multimodal Not comparable

Pixtral Large: 30.6 (#111), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkPixtral LargeQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Vision1089—

Multilingual Not comparable

Pixtral Large: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.2 (#48)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPixtral LargeQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English—1437
LMArena Chinese—1487
LMArena French—1449
LMArena Russian—1445
LMArena Spanish—1454

Instruction Following Not comparable

Pixtral Large: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.7 (#55)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPixtral LargeQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following—1438

Long Context Not comparable

Pixtral Large: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#61)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPixtral LargeQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query—1457

Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#278), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 63.8 (#60)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPixtral LargeQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Text—1447
LMArena Creative Writing—1435
EQ-Bench Creative Writing988—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1456

Frequently asked questions

Is Pixtral Large better than Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Pixtral Large or Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is cheaper. It lists at $1.30 per million input tokens and $7.80 per million output tokens; Pixtral Large lists at $2 and $6.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Pixtral Large and Qwen3.6 Max Preview share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Pixtral Large has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper