Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs o4-mini

o4-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.6 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

o4-mini OpenAI

41.6

Rank #132 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and o4-mini in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where o4-mini leads 54.0 to 29.1.
  • Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and o4-mini specifications
Falcon-180Bo4-mini
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteOpenAI
Noometry Index32.241.6
Released2023-09-062025-04-16
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—200K
Max output—100K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.10
Output $ / M tokens—$4.40
Results tracked1660

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, o4-mini: 40.9 (#127)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180Bo4-mini
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—45%
Aider Polyglot—72%
GSO—3.6%
WeirdML—52.6%
LMArena Coding—1368
CadEval—62%
ALE-Bench—826.17
AlgoTune—1.72

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, o4-mini: 32.6 (#61)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180Bo4-mini
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—53.2%
GDPval—25.3%
METR Time Horizons—63.9%

Reasoning o4-mini leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), o4-mini: 24.6 (#162)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180Bo4-mini
LMArena Hard Prompts10071351
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13145.64
ARC-AGI-2—6.1%
SimpleBench—38.7%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—67.6%
ARC-AGI-1—58.7%
CritPt—0.6%
Chess Puzzles—26%
EnigmaEval—9.2%
Mystery Game Puzzles—5%
DTBench—77.6%
LMCA—26.5%
ForecastBench—61.8
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, o4-mini: 40.8 (#89)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180Bo4-mini
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—36.1%
FrontierMath Tier 4—4.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—81.7%
Omni-MATH—72%
LMArena Math—1389
MATH Level 5—97.8%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—24.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—6.3%
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, o4-mini: 43.6 (#91)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180Bo4-mini
GPQA Diamond—79.6%
Humanity's Last Exam—18.1%
SimpleQA Verified—19.6%
MMLU-Pro—82%
Confabulations—15.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—18.6%
GPQA (HELM)—73.5%
LMArena Expert—1343
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, o4-mini: 40.2 (#49)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180Bo4-mini
LMArena Vision—1194
GeoBench—64%
VPCT—57.5%

Multilingual o4-mini leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), o4-mini: 47.0 (#154)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180Bo4-mini
LMArena Non-English10001337
LMArena Chinese—1354
LMArena French—1364
LMArena German—1336
LMArena Japanese—1308
LMArena Korean—1312
LMArena Russian—1334
LMArena Spanish—1347

Instruction Following o4-mini leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), o4-mini: 75.2 (#68)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180Bo4-mini
LMArena Instruction Following10471321
IFEval—92.8%

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, o4-mini: 45.5 (#33)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180Bo4-mini
Fiction.LiveBench—77.8%
LMArena Longer Query—1315

Writing & Preference o4-mini leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), o4-mini: 54.0 (#152)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180Bo4-mini
LMArena Text10541353
LMArena Creative Writing10891294
LMArena Multi-Turn10131350
Short-Story Creative Writing—75%
WildBench—85.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than o4-mini?

o4-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.6 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and o4-mini share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and o4-mini has 60.

Related comparisons

Go deeper