Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Google

41.5

Rank #133 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads 64.2 to 29.1.
  • Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite specifications
Falcon-180BGemini 3.5 Flash Lite
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteGoogle
Noometry Index32.241.5
Released2023-09-062026-07-21
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$2.50
Results tracked1639

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena WebDev—1440
SciCode—41.3%
WeirdML—39%
LMArena Coding—1453
ALE-Bench—765.27

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 3.5 Flash Lite
APEX-Agents—29.3%
GDP.pdf—10%

Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Hard Prompts10071441
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13145.13
ARC-AGI-2—10.3%
NYT Connections (extended)—60.4%
ARC-AGI-1—53.5%
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles—22%
Mystery Game Puzzles—19%
DTBench—83.5%
LMCA—37.6%
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 3.5 Flash Lite
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—26%
FrontierMath Tier 4—0%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—71.1%
ProofBench—13%
LMArena Math—1433
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 3.5 Flash Lite
GPQA Diamond—83.3%
LMArena Expert—1435
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Vision—1268

Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Non-English10001427
LMArena Chinese—1469
LMArena French—1451
LMArena German—1454
LMArena Japanese—1427
LMArena Korean—1407
LMArena Russian—1443
LMArena Spanish—1442

Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Instruction Following10471420

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Longer Query—1435

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text10541435
LMArena Creative Writing10891420
LMArena Multi-Turn10131445
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1559

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper