Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs Muse Glimmer
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation Institute
MetaSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Glimmer leads 57.5 to 29.1.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 41.7 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1416 |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1396 |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1417 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1386 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1390 |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1375 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1382 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1399 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than Muse Glimmer?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Muse Glimmer share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.