Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs MiniMax-M3
MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation Institute
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M3 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M3 leads 62.1 to 29.1.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | MiniMax-M3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 43.8 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2026-06-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 512K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 41 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, MiniMax-M3: 41.8 (#118)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | — | 14.7% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1482 |
| SciCode | — | 47.1% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1469 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 640.02 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, MiniMax-M3: 22.6 (#130)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.7% |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 4.6% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 2,158 |
Reasoning MiniMax-M3 leads
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), MiniMax-M3: 30.1 (#87)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1447 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | 146.95 |
| SimpleBench | — | 45.8% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 65.1% |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 14% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 8% |
| DTBench | — | 78.9% |
| LMCA | — | 33.7% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 55% |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.4 |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, MiniMax-M3: 40.0 (#95)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 71.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 18% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1429 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#35)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 90.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1461 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, MiniMax-M3: 40.2 (#51)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1253 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1435 |
Multilingual MiniMax-M3 leads
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), MiniMax-M3: 53.0 (#75)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1463 |
| LMArena French | — | 1447 |
| LMArena German | — | 1426 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1381 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1372 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1432 |
Instruction Following MiniMax-M3 leads
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), MiniMax-M3: 75.5 (#62)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1433 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#72)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1445 |
Writing & Preference MiniMax-M3 leads
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), MiniMax-M3: 62.1 (#83)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1433 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1404 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1442 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1150 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than MiniMax-M3?
MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and MiniMax-M3 share?
7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M3 has 41.