Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs Grok 4.3

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.3 xAI

43.8

Rank #86 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.3 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.3 leads 58.5 to 29.1.
  • Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and Grok 4.3 specifications
Falcon-180BGrok 4.3
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstitutexAI
Noometry Index32.243.8
Released2023-09-062026-04-17
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—30K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$2.50
Results tracked1640

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Grok 4.3: 41.6 (#121)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 4.3
LMArena WebDev—1357
SciCode—47.3%
WeirdML—49.9%
LMArena Coding—1415
ALE-Bench—944.17

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Grok 4.3: 27.7 (#99)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 4.3
GDP.pdf—8%
LMArena Search—1165
Vending-Bench 2—35.26

Reasoning Grok 4.3 leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Grok 4.3: 35.9 (#68)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 4.3
LMArena Hard Prompts10071396
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13149.16
NYT Connections (extended)—55.2%
CritPt—8%
Chess Puzzles—25%
DTBench—90.7%
LMCA—38.3%
ForecastBench—60.3
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Grok 4.3: 46.0 (#74)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 4.3
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—42.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4—14.6%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%
ProofBench—11%
LMArena Math—1388
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Grok 4.3: 52.5 (#62)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 4.3
GPQA Diamond—88.8%
SimpleQA Verified—33.2%
LMArena Expert—1385
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Grok 4.3: 31.6 (#104)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 4.3
LMArena Vision—1229
Blueprint-Bench 2—0%

Multilingual Grok 4.3 leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Grok 4.3: 50.5 (#120)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 4.3
LMArena Non-English10001385
LMArena Chinese—1422
LMArena French—1412
LMArena German—1395
LMArena Japanese—1379
LMArena Korean—1356
LMArena Russian—1399
LMArena Spanish—1398

Instruction Following Grok 4.3 leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Grok 4.3: 72.1 (#140)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 4.3
LMArena Instruction Following10471366

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Grok 4.3: 42.5 (#123)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 4.3
LMArena Longer Query—1393

Writing & Preference Grok 4.3 leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Grok 4.3: 58.5 (#118)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 4.3
LMArena Text10541397
LMArena Creative Writing10891380
LMArena Multi-Turn10131406
EQ-Bench 4—1075

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than Grok 4.3?

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Grok 4.3 share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.3 has 40.

Related comparisons

Go deeper