Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Falcon-180B
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
Technology Innovation InstituteSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 4 categories and Falcon-180B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.1 to 29.1.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Falcon-180B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Technology Innovation Institute |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 32.2 |
| Released | — | 2023-09-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1007 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 112.13 |
| HellaSwag | — | 89% |
| LAMBADA | — | 79.8% |
| PIQA | — | 84.9% |
| WinoGrande | — | 87.1% |
Math Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 54.4% |
Knowledge Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 67.8% |
| BoolQ | — | 89% |
| MMLU | — | 70.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 64.2% |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | — |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1047 |
Long Context Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | — |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1054 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | 1089 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1013 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Falcon-180B?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Falcon-180B share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Falcon-180B has 16.