Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs GLM-5V-Turbo
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5V-Turbo in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 62.5 to 29.1.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | GLM-5V-Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 43.8 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2026-04-01 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $4 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1401 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1466 |
Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1443 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1441 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1452 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1416 |
Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1488 |
| LMArena French | — | 1444 |
| LMArena German | — | 1423 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1431 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1450 |
Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1423 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1438 |
Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1416 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1432 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than GLM-5V-Turbo?
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and GLM-5V-Turbo share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5V-Turbo has 19.