Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation InstituteSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 65.3 to 29.1.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 45.2 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1479 |
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1503 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 899.8 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1488 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 34.4% |
| CritPt | — | 4% |
| DTBench | — | 84.5% |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 22% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1481 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1503 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1449 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1507 |
| LMArena French | — | 1488 |
| LMArena German | — | 1458 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1437 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1450 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1471 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1477 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1483 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1440 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1477 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1493 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1208 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.