Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 26.8 to 12.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 59% for Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and 84.5% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 45.2 |
| Released | 2024-02-15 | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 45 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 34.2 (#241), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1294 | 1503 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1479 |
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| WeirdML | 22.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | — |
| CadEval | 34% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 899.8 |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.9 (#145), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 3.4% | — |
| Cybench | 7.5% | — |
| BALROG | 21% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#338), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1296 | 1488 |
| DTBench | 59% | 84.5% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 27.1% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 34.4% |
| CritPt | — | 4% |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 89.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 25.8 (#266), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1315 | 1481 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 23.1% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 22% |
| Omni-MATH | 36.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 70.4% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.4 (#239), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1279 | 1503 |
| GPQA Diamond | 57.2% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 53.4% | — |
| MMLU | 86.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.8 (#77), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1161 | — |
| Video-MME | 75% | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.3 (#174), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1312 | 1449 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1331 | 1507 |
| LMArena French | 1302 | 1488 |
| LMArena German | 1286 | 1458 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1292 | 1412 |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | 1437 |
| LMArena Russian | 1320 | 1450 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1311 | 1471 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.6 (#185), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1477 |
| IFEval | 83.7% | — |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.8 (#169), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | 1483 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.4 (#172), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1319 | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1333 | 1440 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1296 | 1477 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1493 |
| WildBench | 81.3% | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1208 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.