Model comparison
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 65.5 to 35.7.
Side by side
| Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 44.8 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.9 (#232), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.0 (#58)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1186 | 1502 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1477 |
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 899.8 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 23.9 (#113), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.1% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 21.2 (#204), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 25.9 (#124)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1146 | 1487 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 34.4% |
| CritPt | — | 4% |
| DTBench | — | 84.5% |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |
Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.4 (#210), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 38.6 (#84)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1152 | 1480 |
| ProofBench | — | 22% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.6 (#218), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 41.5 (#100)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1142 | 1501 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#255), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.3 (#33)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1099 | 1449 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1145 | 1507 |
| LMArena Russian | 1092 | 1450 |
| LMArena French | — | 1489 |
| LMArena German | — | 1455 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1418 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1436 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1470 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.9 (#254), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.6 (#21)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1131 | 1477 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#236), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#38)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1162 | 1482 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.7 (#261), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.5 (#47)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1150 | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1129 | 1440 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1108 | 1477 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1493 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1208 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.0 versus 33.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.