Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation Institute
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 64.3 to 29.1.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | Qwen3.7 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 45.3 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2026-06-02 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.60 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1473 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1460 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | 147.37 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1466 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1467 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |
Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1510 |
| LMArena French | — | 1473 |
| LMArena German | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1457 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1440 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1455 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1460 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than Qwen3.7 Plus?
Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Qwen3.7 Plus share?
7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.