Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs Qwen3 Max

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

43.7

Rank #87 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 Max in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3 Max leads 62.4 to 29.1.
  • Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and Qwen3 Max specifications
Falcon-180BQwen3 Max
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index32.243.7
Released2023-09-062025-09-23
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.20
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1633

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3 Max: 43.0 (#93)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3 Max
LMArena Coding—1456
ALE-Bench—370.45

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3 Max: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3 Max
Vending-Bench 2—71.56

Reasoning Qwen3 Max leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Qwen3 Max: 22.6 (#190)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts10071448
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13142.38
Kagi LLM Benchmark—72.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—30.1%
Chess Puzzles—4%
Mystery Game Puzzles—5%
DTBench—82.1%
LMCA—28.3%
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3 Max: 38.7 (#131)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3 Max
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—18.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—73.3%
LMArena Math—1446
MATH Level 5—97.1%
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#78)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3 Max
GPQA Diamond—72.6%
SimpleQA Verified—48.7%
LMArena Expert—1455
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multilingual Qwen3 Max leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Qwen3 Max: 53.7 (#62)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3 Max
LMArena Non-English10001429
LMArena Chinese—1478
LMArena French—1449
LMArena German—1463
LMArena Japanese—1397
LMArena Korean—1399
LMArena Russian—1428
LMArena Spanish—1462

Instruction Following Qwen3 Max leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Qwen3 Max: 74.8 (#87)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3 Max
LMArena Instruction Following10471419

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#134)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3 Max
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%
CL-bench—14.5%
LMArena Longer Query—1438

Writing & Preference Qwen3 Max leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Qwen3 Max: 62.4 (#76)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3 Max
LMArena Text10541439
LMArena Creative Writing10891402
LMArena Multi-Turn10131446

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Qwen3 Max share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper